How to Write an Evaluation Essay on Medical Ethics

How to Write an Evaluation Essay on Medical Ethics The purpose of writing an evaluation essay on medical ethics is to demonstrate the quality of a particular place, product, service, or program. You might also want to demonstrate the overall quality of any of the items above. Any valuation you produce will have some form of opinion if you do it properly but the goal here is not to come off as highly opinionated but instead to effectively evaluate something with reason and lack of bias. The key to making this happen is to establish criteria which you will then use to make clear judgments based on fair evidence. Criterion.  Criteria means you establish what an ideal service, products, or place really is. You have to demonstrate to your reader what they should expect from an ideal outcome. Having a clear list of criteria is what prevents your evaluation from seeming more like an opinion piece. For example, if you are evaluating a medical classroom, you want to establish what criteria will make a good school classroom such as the quality of education, the deadline, the teacher, and the interactions used by the teacher and student. You then apply this criteria to the specific classroom you are evaluating for your evaluation essay on medical ethics. Judgement.  The judgment section of your evaluation essay on medical ethics is where you establish whether or not the criteria you listed is met. In other words, you judge the product, place, book, or thing for what it actually is. You take the criteria you established as ideal and evaluate whether your topic or Target meet this standard of quality or whether perhaps it exceeds the standard of quality. Evidence.  The evidence is where you provide support for the Judgment you made. If your judgment is that a particular class does not consistently offer high-quality education, you will need to support this with evidence to show how you came to this conclusion and why that conclusion is sound. Structure of Your Essay.  Generally speaking every paragraph in your evaluation essay on medical ethics will focus on one criterion, followed by one judgment and the supporting evidence. Because of this it is important that your evaluation contain several different lists of criteria and judgments.  You must also make sure that you offer a thesis at the very beginning such that your reader knows what your evaluation is going to be. Once again, you want to clearly state what your criteria, judgment, and evidence will be so that the reader understands when the evaluation is mostly positive and when it is mostly negative. Picking Your Topic.  If you are allowed to select your topic, it is important that you focus on something specific and not something vague. When writing about something in the medical field or the field of ethics, you dont want to cover just medical ethics as a whole. You want to cover one specific aspect not a range of similar aspects. The more you know a topic before you start the easier it will be for you to establish the necessary criteria, judgment and supporting evidence. This concludes our guide on how to write an evaluation essay on medical ethics. We hope you enjoyed it and proudly follow it up with our 10 facts on medical ethics for evaluation essay as well as 20 topics and 1 sample essay.

Amendment and Silent Correction of Quoted Content

Amendment and Silent Correction of Quoted Content Amendment and Silent Correction of Quoted Content Amendment and Silent Correction of Quoted Content By Mark Nichol What do you do when you wish to incorporate a quotation from another source into your own content, but the quotation includes a flaw in spelling, grammar, or the like, or you want to use the quotation selectively? How and whether you amend quoted material depends on the content and the context. In a formal context, such as a scholarly or other authoritative nonfiction book, if source material is flawed, you have several options depending on the type or extent of nonstandard content. For a simple misspelling or grammatical error, follow the mistake with the interpolation [sic], italicizing the word, derived from Latin, that means â€Å"so† or â€Å"thus† and indicates that the preceding error is reproduced from the original material; the brackets should be styled in normal roman type. If errors are ubiquitous, or an obsolete convention such as rampant capitalization is repeated, acknowledge that fact in a brief preceding note in the text, a concise bracketed comment, or a footnote. These strategies are also appropriate to clarify that the writer reproducing the quotation does not condone a controversial remark or an offensive term or comment within it. What if a passage already includes ellipses and you wish to omit phrases or sentences? Distinguish between the original ellipses and your own, perhaps by enclosing the ellipses you have introduced within brackets and explaining in a preceding note or in a footnote that this treatment indicates introduced, as opposed to original, omissions. If the context does not make clear that original ellipses have not been introduced, insert a bracketed note such as â€Å"[Ellipses in original],† but employ this intrusive strategy in moderation. In such formal content, quotations should preserve spelling, capitalization, punctuation, and treatment such as italicization or full capitalization of a word. However, if an entire sentence or passage originally appeared italicized or in all-caps, you can render it in friendlier type and note in brackets how the material originally appeared. (Also, when introducing italics to emphasize a point, follow that treatment with the note â€Å"[Emphasis added.]† Conversely, to clarify that the italics are original, insert the note â€Å"[Italics in original.†) The Chicago Manual of Style supports limited corrections or format changes such as the following: 1. Revision of quotation marks to conform to the prevailing style (such as changing single quotation marks, used in British English, to double quotation marks, standard in American English). 2. Revision of the first letter of the first word from uppercase to lowercase or vice versa as required to integrate the quotation with the preceding text. (It is not necessary to bracket a change in case except in legal writing or textual commentary.) 3. Insertion of terminal punctuation (a period, question mark, or exclamation point) or replacement of existing punctuation to integrate the quotation into the surrounding text. 4. Omission of superscript note indicators, such as numbers or asterisks, when the notes are not retained. 5. Isolated misspellings or typographical errors (but retain â€Å"mistakes† when they are deliberate, such as when imitating an illiterate attempt at writing, or when quoting from material written at a time when spelling was nonstandard). 6. Adjustment of indented or centered text to match formatting of the surrounding text. In less formal contexts, you can employ silent correction, the strategy of simply editing the original material without comment. Writers must used sound judgment, however, in minimizing the alterations and refraining from altering the meaning or intent of the original content. Usually, silent correction should be employed only to correct misspellings or erroneous punctuation. If the grammar of the original material is poor or the material is otherwise problematic, it is probably better to paraphrase entirely or to directly quote only key phrases. Also, exercise caution when reproducing heavily accented speech. Gonna, wanna, and similar lazy pronunciations need not be reproduced; doing so, or representing mispronunciations such as â€Å"nukular,† may be misinterpreted as condescending to the speaker. Silent correction is also appropriate for errors such as flustrated as a confusion of flustered and frustrated. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Business Writing category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:Program vs. Programme"Certified" and "Certificated"Dissatisfied vs. Unsatisfied